Sunday, 8 September 2013

English 203
Fall 2013
Dr. Morefield

Research Paper Assignment & Requirements

The requirements of the paper are as follows:
--Subject matter of the paper must be in some way related to course reading.
--2500-3000 words (generally 8-10 pages, if correctly formatted), in correct MLA format. (See Blackboard for MLA formatting help.)
--Minimum of five (5) cited sources.
--The literary text must be one of the sources cited.
--Essay must cite at least four (4) non-Internet sources. (A source originally written for a book or journal and reprinted on the Internet is not considered an Internet source. The key distinction here is where it was originally published, not where you located it.)
--Do not cite lecture notes (Powerpoint) as a source unless you have special permission to do so. When these are not quotes from the primary text, they usually consist of general information that is not proprietary and should be paraphrased but not cited. If there is information you want to use in a paper from a course lecture, please speak with me and I can tell you how to include it or where to look for that information from a citable source.
--Do not cite any of the following. They will not count towards source requirement and will result in a lower paper grade even if the source requirements are already met: Wikipedia, Cliffs Notes, Spark Notes, eNotes, Monkey Notes or any sort of summary or discussion/study aid. If you are not sure if a source is suitable, ask me.
--The following sources do not count towards the source requirement: a general dictionary, any general encyclopedia. A specialized dictionary or a specialized encyclopedia may be suitable and allowable. If you are not sure whether or not a source falls into this category, please ask me.

An electronic copy of the same paper you submitted uploaded to the correct turnitin.com folder no later than midnight on September 28, 2013. Students must retain drafts, notes, and evidence of work process and be able to submit them upon request. Inability to produce research notes or evidence of work process, could result in academic penalties, including receiving a zero on the assignment. Feedback will be given to students via GradeMark on Turnitin.com. Turnitin.com enrollment number=6661159; enrollment password=Morefield.
Topic #1
Select one of the texts from the syllabus and explain how the work clarifies or complicates your understanding of the time period in which it was written.  In what way is the work typical of its genre and/or time period?  What ideas, themes, or genres does the author explore? Are there ways in which this text is different from others in its time period? What is the significance of these similarities or differences?

Topic #2
Compare the representation of a theme or idea in one of the literary texts to a text from a different literary period that explores the same theme. In what ways (if any) have beliefs, practices, or ideas changed since the time of the text you read and how do the texts reflect that change? (In this option, the second text may not necessarily have to be one we read in class, but if it is not, you must clear it with the instructor first.)

Topic #3
Select one of the readings from the course syllabus and explain how a theme, idea, issue, or lesson from the reading is personally applicable to your life or to your current situation. (This can be narrowly focused such as on your immediate situation, or it can be more broadly construed, such as on contemporary political or social issues.) Note that if you do this topic, you are still responsible for meeting the research requirements, but the nature of some of your sources may be different. Please make an appointment with me if you are considering doing this option and need some help in thinking about how to integrate research sources.

Topic #4
If you have an alternate topic about which you would like to write, consult with the instructor for further guidance.

SAMPLE PAPER  
Different Time, Different Place, Same Story: Comparison of Social Constraints on Women in The Awakening and The Coquette
Nineteenth century American author Henry James once affirmed, “We know a man imperfectly until we know his society, and we but half know a society until we know its manners” (251).  Societal conventions dictate every aspect of a community.  They determine what is deemed appropriate and what is deemed taboo.  Therefore it would be impossible to attempt to thoroughly understand an individual’s thoughts, motivations, and decisions without first considering the social context in which they transpire.  James continued, “This is especially true of a man of letters, for manners lie very close to literature” (251).  The literary genre of novel of manners uses letters (i.e. words) to explore “the manners, social customs, folkways, conventions, traditions, and mores…[that] play a dominant role in the lives of fictional characters, exert control over their thought and behavior, and constitute a determinant upon the actions in which they are engaged” (Tuttleon 10).  The context surrounding the story is an essential aspect of the tale itself and a slight modification of this social world would completely change the story’s implications.  Authors Hannah Webster Foster and Kate Chopin employ the literary characteristics of the novel of manners in their respective novels The Coquette and The Awakening.  Although the novels are set in two distinct eras of American history, in two distinct locations of America, they both provide not only an explorative overview of the relational customs of their respective societies, but also a social criticism of the culture in regards to the role of women through the presence of unconventional female protagonists who struggle to conform with these ideals.
            Just as an examination of the social context is necessary for a more complete comprehension of a novel, so is the consideration of the historical and geographic perspectives.  A comparison of The Coquette and The Awakening is futile without a conscious recognition that the works explore two very different settings in two separate time periods.  The Coquette was penned by Hannah Webster Foster, a wealthy erudite, who lived in Massachusetts during the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries.  Published in 1797, The Coquette, also known as The Coquette; or, The History of Eliza Wharton; A Novel; Founded on Fact. By a Lady of Massachusetts, was written in a time in which Americans, especially those from New England, were skeptical of fictional works.  Foster, therefore, adapted an infamous scandal, tweaking and recreating certain aspects to serve her literary agenda.  Catherine “Kate” Chopin, on the other hand, did not have to feign connections to a factual event because the sentiment towards fiction in America had changed by the mid to late nineteenth century.  Although many of Chopin’s writings allegorically reflect her personal desires, opinions, and affairs (Adams xvii) they do claim to be nonfictional or fictionalized accounts.  Edna Pontellier, the protagonist of Chopin’s The Awakening of 1899, is a mere creation of the author’s imagination.  However, geographically and socially, her environment like those of typical novels of manners is an accurate depiction of New Orleans, Louisiana at the turn of the century.  The geographic location of both novelists is significant for, as John W. Aldridge expresses,
There are only two cultural pockets left in America; and they are the Deep South and that area of northeastern United States…This is to say that these are the only places in the country which could possibly produce novelists of manners because they are the only places where there are any manners.  In all the other parts of the country people live in a kind of vastly standardized cultural prairie…and that means that they don’t really live and they don’t really do anything. (__)
According to Aldridge, were it not for their setting in the so-called cultured regions of Louisiana in the Deep South and Connecticut in the northeastern United Sates, the stories of Edna Pontellier and Eliza Wharton would not be considered novels of manners.
            The New Haven and Hartford, Connecticut as well as the New Orleans and Grand Isle, Louisiana depicted in The Coquette and The Awakening truly are locales with a rich culture, complex social hierarchy and strict codes of propriety.  Subtle integrations of local practices set the stage for the most prominent social condition that dominates both works: the inferior role of women within society.  However, neither author could aptly assert her social criticism without having first established an authentic representation of the community itself.  Kate Chopin “writes as an insider whose intimacy with her subjects is conveyed through the use of local dialect and allusion” (Adams xxi).  She frequently references works from popular French and Creole culture such as the opera Zampa (Chopin 2) or other French lullabies (Chopin 122), while also using the French names for common everyday items like the mets or entre-mets[1] (Chopin 118).  Characters often converse in a mixture of English and French--Creole, the vernacular language of Louisiana.  In fact, the novel begins with a caged bilingual parrot repeatedly squawking, “Allez vous-en!  Allez vous-en!  Sapristi![2]  That’s all right!” (Chopin 1).  Although the greater significance of the bird and his speech has not yet been revealed, the reader does ascertain the prominent Creole influence in the community. 
Linguistic nuances in Hannah Webster Foster’s The Coquette manifest differently, as spoken language is not the primary means of communication.  The Coquette is written in the epistolary style, meaning the story is composed of letters of correspondence between nine characters.  In this way, the reader knows only that which the characters choose to reveal about themselves and their situations within their letters.  Dorothy Baker suggests that the actual language and rhetoric employed by the writers becomes significant, requiring “the reader’s heightened sensitivity to the language of [the characters’] discourse” (58) in order to recognize the slight variations between characters.  The emotional evolution of a single character can also be traced through his/her diction as the novel progresses.  For example, Eliza Wharton becomes more withdrawn from society, she gradually suspends the written communication upon which she once thrived, saying, “Writing is an employment, which suits me not at present” (Foster 883).  “The woman whose voice opens the text with such élan is also the woman whose voice disappears from the novel long before its close” (Baker 64).  In both The Awakening and The Coquette the protagonists struggle internally to comprehend exactly what it is that language represents in their lives.  At times language is a liberating device that they can manipulate as a form of self-expression. In a letter to Lucy Freeman, Eliza retorts, “I believe I shall never again resume those airs, which you term coquettish, but which I think deserve a softer appellation…” (Foster 809), demonstrating the ability of a singular word to inflect such great meaning on a sentence.  Unfortunately, language is more often a constrictive, overpowering, uncontrollable force, symbolic of society as a whole. 
Language is not merely a facet of culture, but in the case of The Awakening and The Coquette, it is also a symbol of the culture itself.  Critic A. Elizabeth Elz relates the anecdotal tale of the talkative parrot from the opening pages of The Awakening with Edna Pontellier’s concurrent situation.  Elz claims the parrot, who speaks both French and English “and also a language which nobody understood” (Chopin 1), personifies Edna’s Creole husband, Léonce Pontellier (14).  Mr. Pontellier, like the bilingual parrot speaks, both English and French--understood languages; he also “has a third language--social customs” that is incomprehensible to his Kentuckian wife “because she did not grow up in the Creole society [and] is weak in both understanding and practicing the language of the Creole social customs” (Elz 14).  The Pontelliers’ communication breakdown is most clearly manifested when Léonce scolds Edna, exclaiming, “Why, my dear, I should think you’d understand by this time that people don’t do such things; we’ve got to observe les convenances[3]” (Chopin 68).  She may be able to intellectually converse in English and French, but Kate Chopin makes it very clear that Edna Pontellier will never attain fluency in the social language of native Louisianan Creoles like her husband and friends.  Mrs. Pontellier will never be “thoroughly at home in the society of the Creoles” (Chopin 12).  Likewise, Eliza Wharton never fully attains “communicative competence” within her group of female friends (Baker 60).
In spite of the lack of communicative competence on behalf of Edna Pontellier and Eliza Wharton, both female protagonists belong to an intimate group of influential women of the community.  The inclusion of this female clique, which critic Claire Pettengill refers to as a “sisterhood” (186), is intentional by the authors. The sisterhood proves essential in keeping with the characteristics of the novel of manners as it presents an opportunity for the reader to explore the social customs, expectations, and stigmas of the society in which the main character lives.  The protagonists’ friends are not merely flat secondary characters and one should not underestimate “the crucial role played by the tightly knit circle of women which supports, encourages, protects and provides for Eliza even as it scolds and criticizes her” (Pettengill 186).  Similarly, Edna Pontellier’s two female mentors, Mademoiselle Reisz and Adèle Ratignolle, provide assistance and criticism as Edna attempts to define her role as a woman, wife, and mother (Elz 17).  As a literary device, the sisterhood serves in two capacities: as a point of comparison with the unconventional protagonist and as a demonstration of societal ideals; however, the actual influence on the main characters’ decisions is immeasurable.  Pettengill argues, “The bonds of female friendships…shape [the protagonist]’s thought and actions as much as any other system of values, and work in the novel both to advance and retard the more conventional plot” (186). 
The contrast between Edna Pontellier and the two most influential women in her life is blatantly obvious.  At one extreme, there is Adèle Ratignolle, “the embodiment of every womanly grace and charm” (Chopin 10), who perfectly conforms to the ideals of Republican motherhood, which Chopin defines as “women who idolized their children, worshiped their husbands, and esteemed it a holy privilege to efface themselves as individuals and grow wings as ministering angels” (10).  Well-loved by the men, women, and children of the community, Madame Ratignolle grows very fond of Edna Pontellier, who she sees struggling to adapt to the role of motherhood within the Creole society, and vows to take her “under her wing” (Elz 17).  While Adèle Ratignolle epitomizes the quintessential woman in the affluent Creole society of Louisiana at the turn of the century, at the other extreme is Edna’s second mentor, Mademoiselle Reisz.  Whereas the beautiful Madame Ratignolle is what critic A. Elizabeth Elz refers to as a “True Woman,” Mademoiselle Reisz, as a “New Woman,” adheres to a completely distinct set of social standards.  “A disagreeable little woman, no longer young, who had quarreled with almost every one, owing to a temper which was self-assertive and a disposition to trample upon the rights of others” (Chopin 33), the mademoiselle elicits a very different response from the people of Grand Isle.  They do not see her alternative lifestyle, in the sense that she is self-sufficient without need of a husband, as a laudable asset.  She remains on the fringes of society, being welcomed in only as the entertainment.  She lives through artistic expression and connects with Madame Pontellier through the arts.  Like Madame Ratignolle, Mademoiselle Reisz acknowledges and accepts her position within the social hierarchy.  It is only their disciple, Edna Pontellier, who vacillates.
The female relationships in Hannah Webster Foster’s The Coquette are more difficult to analyze than those of Kate Chopin’s The Awakening because of the absence of a narrator and the progression of the characters through several major life changes.  While the women of The Awakening  do not undergo life-altering changes other than the arrival of yet another child to the Ratignolle family, Eliza Wharton’s circle of friends experience death, betrothal, marriage, childbirth, and extreme heartbreak.  The effect of these events is even greater felt since the protagonist is a single woman and her friends “Lucy and Mrs. Richman are several steps ‘beyond’ Eliza in the crucial transition from daughter to wife to mother” (Pettengil 194).  Lucy Freeman Sumner, the recipient of the majority of Eliza’s epistles, experiences the most       



[1] Main courses and side dishes (French)
[2] Go away!  Go away!  For God’s sake! (French)

No comments:

Post a Comment